Read about other happenings...
« My pen is mightier than your pistol | Main | Thanksgiving is for immigrants »
Thursday
Feb202014

We have only ourselves to blame: a voter's manifesto

As a citizen of this nation, chances are that you assume you bear no responsibility for the corrupt and dysfunctional condition of our government.

And, unless you’ve organized with plurality of voters to blunt the outsized influence of elite, wealthy interests, you would be unaccountably wrong.

The assumption especially rings true for do-nothing pundits and hand-sitting voters who habitually blame government for the myriad difficulties we face as a nation. It is, at best, a myopic view. It never accounts for plutocrats who have paid handsomely for access to politicians; nor for well-connected lobbyists and captains of industry who continually co-opt government policy decisions.

The authority of what was once known—and exercised—as the will of the people, wields no such influence. There is no will of the people, only their quiescence.

Where were we, the people, as legal bribery became a frog-boiling reality?

Through passivity and a shameful neglect of civics, voters gave up whatever public policy torque they may have wielded in decades past. In matters like national elections, their participation amounts to nothing more than a rubber stamp of candidates selected by party bosses and large dollar funders.

Somehow the idea that the only viable candidates for public office are those who can raise boatloads of cash, has prevailed over all else—even qualities like vision and character (although we must credit the GOP for fielding a memorable roster of "characters" serving in Congress).

Given the massive amount of funding needed for media buys, political consultants and other campaign “essentials” crucial to winning election, one must see the imprint of a disengaged electorate; a supremely inert body of voters requiring the shock and awe of hyperbolic attack ads to jolt them to a decision between the lesser of two evils. There is a perverse inverse relationship between the meager involvement of voters in electoral politics and how much time and effort incumbents and candidates for public office must devote to fundraising.

It is unmistakable: voters suffer from an influence gap that privileges campaign donors with deep pockets.

However, we have no one else to blame but ourselves.

(By the way, you’ll never hear the politics of campaign finance being discussed in such frank terms by any politician or pontificating pundit who must pretend that legal bribery emits no moral stench.)

Since taxes are such a sensitive, ire-provoking subject, wouldn't it be useful for voters to acknowledge one area where the influence gap puts them at a disadvantage?

The current U.S. tax code maintains the constant churning of legal bribes for members of Congress. To keep de juris tax scoffers like Verizon, Apple and Bristol-Meyers Squibb returning as clients, special exemptions are written into law for their benefit. Such ad hoc statutes come with expiration dates that give a member of Congress reason enough to call his or her corporate client with an urgent request for support in the effort to renew said tax break.

What's the twisted irony of it all? It's how many voters went along with the tax revolts of the 1970s—a time when the middle class failed to notice that wages no longer kept up with productivity, much less with the rising cost of government. While tax bills increased, their representation in government began to wane because of the money flowing from special interests into the pockets of politicians. Voters latched on to protests against “big government” spending, yet failed to understand what actually makes government “big”. It’s not the federal budget or how much assistance a social program provides, but whether or not citizens are engaged in the struggle to hold elected officials accountable. On that effort, our failure has been stunning.

Again, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

Avant garde record producer, Brian Eno, summed up electoral politics best when he said that "...we don’t do politics. We expect other people to do it for us, and grumble when they get it wrong. We feel that our responsibility stops at the ballot box, if we even get that far. After that we’re as laissez-faire as we can get away with.

"What worries me is that while we’re laissez-ing, someone else is faire-ing."

For far too long voters have been permissive while an entrenched financial principality has taken over our country’s domestic and foreign policies for private gain—always at the expense of the common good.

So, what is a manifesto without a call to action? Less harm than doing nothing (we’ve tried that, haven’t we?) would be to take about ten minutes of your time to contact your senators and member of congress. What’s the message? Simply say that your vote in the next election will go to the candidate who limits all campaign donations to $250 per contributor (including PACs, super PACs and every other money-churning syndicate that can be imagined).

Everyone knows elected officials are on the take; that the wealthy buy their favorable representation in government. Why not talk about it with your friends, family and social media contacts? Not as a problem we are too helpless to solve, but as a solution waiting for participants to put it into action?

Enclosure

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

I'm 70. I can remember when the republicans would outspend the democrats 10 to 1. And the democrats won most of the time. And now......I can look up vote records and see that it is democrats who were in power when Iraq war was voted on. It was democrats that have been collecting cash from labor rallies and then cash from lobbyist and bringing me financial predatory store fronts as far as the eye can see (3 or 4, 900% interest loan sharks per block). I think we allowed this to happen alright. But we seemingly don't have very good choices on election day. And THAT may be because we have allowed the FCC to not do it's job, so that all our news media is anti-worker BS. I Don't take my town newspaper and I sneak around and look at it so no one will know I read the nasty yellow dog rag. I have slinked into the library the last few days and I have discovered that the WHOLE newspaper is made up of ads and editorials.(anti-worker).

February 27, 2014 | Unregistered Commenterjim fisher

Jim Fisher--thank you for your reply. Indeed, Dems are just as much mucked up in elite, special interest money. This is a crucial opportunity for voters to step up and accept responsibility for the sorry state of our republic.

February 27, 2014 | Registered Commenterjude folly

Hey Jude,

You are blaming the victims (the voters) for the acts of the abuser (elected politicians).

It is the system itself - elections themselves - that are to blame. Voters really have no choice but to vote for oligarchs. This is the inherent nature of mass elections. Electoral choice is a mirage.

There is a democratic alternative, however: sortition. Sortition is the selection of government officials as a statistical sample of the population.

I invite you to join the conversation about sortition and the ways to promote it at Equality-by-lot: https://equalitybylot.wordpress.com/introduction-to-sortition-government-by-jury.

February 17, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterYoram Gat

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>